February 7, 2026
I just read part of a mystery novel whose protagonist is a friend of Agatha Christie. It’s part of a series. The friend solves the mysteries with (in this case at least) no input from Agatha.
Here’s the thing about contemporary authors writing about the early 1900s – post WWII era: The writing and the dialogue purport to be in line with the style of the era, but in most cases (as in this one) they are overly formal. And the trend is almost invariable.
I think the reason that I like the real thing—novels about the era that were actually written in the era—is that the writing flows so much better. Read an Agatha Christie or a Dorothy Sayers or a Georgette Heyer (yes, she did contemporary novels as well as the Regencies); the dialogue isn’t at all formal, and the writing has a very light hand.
So why do modern authors make the narration and the dialogue of that era so stilted?
Just asking.