Monday, May 11, 2026

The Chameleon Can't Change His Spots

 

 May 11, 2026

 

I was reading about some of the bills that Josh Hawley is either sponsoring or co-sponsoring. Some of them sound not only useful, but humane.

 

But, let’s face it:

 

Josh Hawley is a chameleon. He changes with the prevailing viewpoint. He’s for Medicaid until he votes against it. He’s for containing the president’s war powers until it’s time to vote. He supported Capitol rioters until he ran from them.

 

He currently talks like he’s for the common man; but when it’s time to vote, Hawley votes for whatever will push his career forward. Like the proverbial leopard, Hawley never really changes his spots.

 

 

DIY Parenting

 

May 8, 2025

 

I was listening to some people talk about how school doesn’t teach kids things that will help them in real life, like balancing a checkbook. For the record, my school, back in the dark ages, did teach a lesson on it; but I already knew, because (gasp!) my parents had taught me.

 

That’s right, folks, my parents took the time to show me things that I needed to know.

 

I didn’t say to the people who were talking, “When I was 9 or 10, my dad handed me his checkbook register and said, ‘Add up those numbers.’ And it was a pretty long column, and we didn’t have a calculator. But we got the checkbook balanced.”

 

No, I said, “Schools are busy teaching things like math, English, and other useful subjects. If you want your kids to learn things like that, you can either teach them yourself or send them to Saturday school.” (I was thinking of “My Big Fat Greek Wedding, where the kids had to go to Greek school on Saturdays.)

 

One person looked like he agreed. If I’d stuck around longer, somebody might have gone into the fact that kids had activities on Saturday; and I could have said, “Your choice. Just don’t dump your responsibilities on teachers.” But it was getting loud at the venue, so I moved on.

 

But seriously, folks, try raising your kids yourselves. Don’t blame schools for not doing it.

 

 

 

Tuesday, May 5, 2026

I Hope the Court Delves

 

 

May 5, 2026

 

I should thank Spirit Airlines for giving me the chance to practice long division.

 

I read a blurb in the paper today that said the airline asked a bankruptcy judge for approval to pay $10.7 million in retention bonuses to its remaining employees. (Spirit, you may know, shut down operations abruptly, laying off workers on the spot.)

 

So, I grabbed a pencil and paper and divided 10,700,000 by 150, the number of remaining employees. If the money were divided equally, each employee would get $71,333.33 for 90 days of work. Seems like quite a deal. If I were the judge, I’d have some questions.

 

However, after 3 months, the number of employees will be reduced to 40.

 

I’m wondering just how much of the $10.7 million will go to the 110 people working 90 days, vs. the 40 employees who are left. I’m guessing that those last 40 employees won’t be getting spare change.

 

I hope the judge asks for details.

 

 

 

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Don't Step on the Gas

 

April 21, 2026

 

I was watching vehicles speeding along the highway, cutting in and out in those daredevil moves where they cut into a lane in front of somebody, leaving no space, then whip into another lane to tailgate somebody else, before they change lanes again to get in front of another driver, and I thought, “Drivers, those moves just DON’T look cool when you’re driving a minivan.”

 

In related news:

 

A few days later I wondered if any of the people complaining about gas prices were considering slowing down in order to increase their mileage.

 

I’m not betting on it.

 

 

 

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

C'mon, Post-Dispatch, You're Better than This

 

April 21, 2026

 

A while ago, I wrote about the University of Missouri – St. Louis offering a second job to St. Louis police chief Robert Tracy, to help supplement his income. I was not sympathetic to the chief’s need to supplement his income, but apparently some people pledged to give the university money to help pay Chief Tracy’s salary for whatever he is doing there.

 

The Post-Dispatch ran an article yesterday saying that so far, only one person had made good on his pledge to donate funding to the cause. I’m not sure why they thought the public needed to know, but I’m sure that they had their reasons. I thought that maybe they were extolling the guy who was honoring his commitment, and maybe nudging the others who had pledged money to honor theirs. 

 

The article then proceeded to list other donations the person had made, noting various political causes and Republican organizations. 

 

Now, here’s the thing: It’s not a crime to be a Republican (even if you support people that I never would) and it’s not a crime to want to keep the chief of police in town. But what one has to do with the other is a mystery to me. So why make a point of the donor being Republican?

 

What really annoyed me, though, was that although this person supports the arts in a big way (Yes, I read the donor lists when I attend cultural events, and in the membership magazines I receive from cultural institutions I belong to), not one of those donations was mentioned in the article. Why not? Would that have ruined the implication that the donor was bereft of finer feelings, and indicated that he was maybe not a 100% bad guy?

 

I was very disappointed in the Post-Dispatch. They can do better than this.