February 18,
2026
There’s a headline in today’s paper about a lawsuit by
residents of Montgomery County, MO who want to void a deal that officials made
with Amazon to put in a data center. I didn’t read much of it; I couldn’t get
past the first paragraph, which mentions giving Amazon up to $1 billion in tax
credits.
A) Amazon needs tax credits like it needs a hole in the head
and
B) Businesses that decide to plunk themselves in an area
should have to be handing over bucks for municipal planning, and to counteract the
negative effects on environment and quality of life issues—NOT getting tax
breaks. They chose the region for a reason—lots of space, cheap land, etc.;
they wouldn’t settle in a place if they weren’t going to benefit from it; so instead
of letting them bleed the place dry, they should be ponying up.
They should pay for the environmental impact study, and have
plans for, and commit funds to, mitigating the effects of increased use of
resources, the inevitable higher housing costs, effects on wildlife, etc.
(This isn't just about Amazon; it goes for sports teams and other businesses that want tax breaks for doing you the favor of gobbling up your resources to enhance their profit margins.)
So, yes, officials should revisit the deal and act like
Hollywood divas, not starving actors ready to work for peanuts: Say, “You want the commodities, you pay
us, we don’t pay you.”
They should hire an agent: An experienced negotiator, used to dealing with big business; and a high-powered law firm to draw up the contracts and ensure that they are kept.
THEN they should consider if the deal is really good for the community.