Showing posts with label Grammar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Grammar. Show all posts

Saturday, March 8, 2025

Putting a Period to Puzzling Punctuation

 

February 15, 2025

OK, I admit it: I had another name for this post, but then the allure of alliteration got to me. In any case:

 

You know how your teacher always made you put the period inside the quotation marks, even when it didn’t make any sense? The example in the article I read was,

Anna said updating the guide was “a difficult and time-consuming task.”

vs.

Anna said updating the guide was “a difficult and time-consuming task”.

 

The first way is American style. The second is British and is sometimes referred to as “logical punctuation.” (I’m again quoting the article, otherwise I would have put the period outside the quotation marks on this one, too.)

 

Anyway, “logical punctuation” seems to sum up the situation nicely. I myself, when asking questions that involve quotations, have given up and put the question mark outside the quotation marks, because it makes sense that way.

 

(From “What’s the Deal?”, August 23, 2013):

August 23, 2013

With homeowners refusing to let firefighters practice firewise techniques to fight fires burning in their area (because they didn’t want their landscaping messed with), will firefighters ever throw up their hands and say, “OK, we’ll let your house burn.”? Will the forest service ever say, “If you don’t practice the firewise techniques yourselves, we won’t risk our lives by even attempting to keep the fire from your house.”? Will the forest service ever say, “If you build here, you’re on your own?” 

Will I ever be able to figure out the proper punctuation for the previous paragraph? (Note the attempt to have it both ways in the paragraph.)

 

Now, because of the article “Point, Counterpoint” by Ben Yagoda in the Pennsylvania Gazette, I am free to use punctuation logically. In fact, according to the author, more people are using the logical punctuation informally, although editors and teachers still adhere to the American rules.

Luckily, nobody’s grading me on this blog.

 

Wednesday, August 16, 2023

Their Timing Could Have Been Better

 

August 16, 2023

 

The same edition of the Post-Dispatch that ran the column about the (mis)use of the word “weaponize” had this headline over an advice column:

 

“Girlfriend weaponizes social media videos”

 

I hope Mr. Epstein (author of the column) didn’t see it.

 

Did He Grammarize "Weaponize"?

 

August 16, 2023

 

I’ve been thinking for some time about writing a post on how annoyingly ubiquitous the word “weaponize” has become. In my mind, it’s primarily used by people who don’t like how someone else is scoring points against them; I think of it as a whiner’s refrain.

 

Enter Joseph Epstein, who wrote a (much longer) column about the word. (It was printed in today’s Post-Dispatch.) The latter part of the column dealt with how “weaponize” has the implication of violence.

 

The first part of the column dealt with the grammatical incorrectness of adding “ize” to nouns to turn them into verbs.

 

You might say he grammarized “weaponize”.