Friday, January 31, 2020

Suppose the Artist were Anonymous?



January 30, 2020


Cross-cultural portrayals seem to be big news these days. A straight actress got slammed for portraying a gay character. A non-Asian actress at the St. Louis Muny got slammed for playing Tuptim in “The King and I”. A non-Mexican author is getting hate mail for writing about the travails of Mexican immigrants to the U.S. A male author wrote a book from a woman’s standpoint; someone I know loved it until she found out it was written by a man.

It sounds like people are just looking for reasons to get mad, but let’s face it: A lot of the bad feeling comes from decades of people in America being overlooked, no matter how talented they were or how great the art they produced, just because they weren’t white or straight or male. That has left scars. (And some readers have said that the book about immigrants perpetuates unpleasant Mexican stereotypes.) So people get angry when they feel that the work of straight white people is still being chosen over other people’s, even when the quality of the work is the same.

I wish everybody’s work could be appraised as if the artist were anonymous. (Like “The Masked Singer”, except that actors would have a hard time  pulling it off, unless they had “Mission Impossible” masks.)

Then, if a man effectively empathized with a woman’s plight, people could admit that the story moved them, no matter who wrote it. Etc.

Would people find less to object to if they didn’t know who produced the work?


No comments: